完形填空題
Science and Truth
"FINAGLE" (欺騙) is not a word that most people associate with science. One reason is that the image of the scientist is of one who always (1) data in an impartial (不偏不倚) search for truth. In any debate - (2) intelligence, schooling, energy-the phrase "science says" usually disarms opposition.
But scientists have long acknowledged the existence of a "finagle factor"-a tendency by many scientists to give a helpful change to the data to (3) desired results. The latest of the finagle factor in action comes from Stephen Jay Gould, a Harvard biologist, who has (4) the important 19th century work of Dr. Samuel George Morton. Morton was famous in his time for analysing the brain (5) of the skulls as a measure of intelligence. He concluded that whites had the largest brains, that the brains of Indians and blacks were smaller,and (6), that whites constitute a superior race.
Gould went back to Morton's original data and concluded that the (7) were an example of the finagle at work. He found that Morton's "discovery" was made by leaving out embarrassing data, (8) incorrect procedures, and changing his criteria - again, always in favour of his argument. Morton has been thoroughly discredited by now and scientists do not believe that brain size reflects (9).
But Gould went on to say Morton's story is only an example of a common problem in (10) work. Some of the leading figures in science are (11) to have used the finagle factor. Gould says that Isaac Newton fudged out (捏造) to support at least three central statements that he could not prove. And so (12) Laudius Ptolemy, the Greek astronomer, whose master work, Almagest, summed up the case for a solar system that had the earth as its centre. Recent (13) indicate that Ptolemy either faked some key data or resorted heavily to the finagle factor.
All this is important because the finagle factor is still at work. For example, in the artificial sweetener controversy, for example, it is (14) that all the studies sponsored by the sugar industry find that the artificial sweetener is unsafe, (15) all the studies sponsored by the diet food industry find nothing wrong with it.
1 A collects B invents C misuses D enables
2 A of B over C in D with
3 A convey B destroy C modify D acquire
4 A created B written C examined D produced
5 A size B shape C tissue D cell
6 A however B then C though D therefore
7 A results B experiments C ideas D suggestions
8 A planning B making C using D searching
9 A creativity B reliability C intelligence D originality
10 A unusual B mental C scientific D manual
11 A taught B believed C tried D allowed
12 A was B had C could D did
13 A studies B events C developments D decisions
14 A feared B said C suggested D expected
15 A if B while C because D although
【參考答案】
1. A 2. B 3. D 4. C 5. A
6. D 7. A 8. C 9. C 10. C
11. B 12. D 13. A 14. B 15. B
學員:chuhero 感謝周涵老師,職稱英語過了。我覺得應該在這里跟老師說聲謝謝,老師的講課很實用,針對性強,是很有學習價值的課程,如果你想通過職稱英語考試,就聽周老師的課程吧。
學員:王仁芝 我去年7月開始差不多從零學起,堅持到考試,考了72分,十分感謝老師及網(wǎng)校的輔導!
學員:lilizhangx 職稱英語通過了!畢業(yè)10年了,沒怎么接觸英語,跟著周涵老師學習,一次通過!
學員:張洪杰 首先感謝周涵老師,好多年沒有學習了,經(jīng)過老師的講解順利過關,這已經(jīng)出乎我的預料,真的很激動,終于沒讓老師們失望,通過了,很高興。
學員:xsqxxlxzj 十多年沒有學習過英語了,通過職業(yè)培訓教育網(wǎng)3個多月的學習,83分通過職稱英語綜合C級考試,非常感謝周涵老師,謝謝您!
學員:best888zhou 畢業(yè)以后就沒有翻過英語了,丟了有七年了,雖然以前基礎還不錯,但這次真的是沒有信心,過年后開始復習,用了差不多一個月的時間,B級綜合考了80分,很開心,謝謝周涵老師的細致講解!
1、凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:正保會計網(wǎng)!钡乃凶髌,版權均屬正保會計網(wǎng)校所有,未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)授權不得轉載、鏈接、轉貼或以其他方式使用;已經(jīng)本網(wǎng)授權的,應在授權范圍內(nèi)使用,且必須注明“來源:正保會計網(wǎng)!薄_`反上述聲明者,本網(wǎng)將追究其法律責任。
2、本網(wǎng)部分資料為網(wǎng)上搜集轉載,均盡力標明作者和出處。對于本網(wǎng)刊載作品涉及版權等問題的,請作者與本網(wǎng)站聯(lián)系,本網(wǎng)站核實確認后會盡快予以處理。
本網(wǎng)轉載之作品,并不意味著認同該作品的觀點或真實性。如其他媒體、網(wǎng)站或個人轉載使用,請與著作權人聯(lián)系,并自負法律責任。
3、本網(wǎng)站歡迎積極投稿
4、聯(lián)系方式:
編輯信箱:tougao@chinaacc.com
電話:010-82319999-2110
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 m.odtgfuq.cn All Rights Reserved. 北京正保會計科技有限公司 版權所有
京B2-20200959 京ICP備20012371號-7 出版物經(jīng)營許可證 京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802044457號